On appeal from the U.S. District Court for … In a nutshell, FIRREA authorizes the DOJ to impose civil financial penalties for violations of specifically penalize conduct injuring financial institutions; others sweep more broadly, but only become FIRREA predicates when the defendant’s conduct “affect[s] a federally insured financial institution.” The $2.385 billion civil monetary penalty resolves claims under FIRREA, which authorizes the federal government to impose civil penalties against financial institutions that violate various predicate offenses, including wire and mail fraud. Certain of those violations, including the most commonly alleged predicate violations, such as mail and wire The Second Circuit declined to rule on the legal questions of whet… (35) While a criminal case requires prosecutors to prove the commission of any of these offenses beyond a reasonable doubt, 12 U.S.C. § 1014 (fraud in “[l]oan and credit applications”). The United States alleged that HSBC violated FIRREA by misrepresenting to investors the quality of its RMBS and the due diligence procedures it claimed it would use to ensure that quality. The government intervened and added claims under FIRREA, which imposes civil liability—in the form of civil monetary penalties—for certain criminal offenses (including violations of the federal mail and wire fraud statutes) that affect a federally insured financial institution. For example, in predicate offenses requiring an “affect” on federally insured financial institutions (“FIFIs”), such as mail fraud (18 U.S.C. The Government seeks civil penalties under FIRREA based upon predicate criminal offenses under 18 U.S.C. Most of the predicate Countrywide appealed the district court’s judgment, arguing that: (i) FIRREA does not permit claims against federally insured financial institutions on the theory that they engaged in fraud “affecting” themselves; (ii) the claimed predicate offenses of mail and wire fraud may not be based exclusively on a breach of contract; (iii) the district court erred in certain evidentiary rulings; and (iv) the district court erred in its calculation of the civil penalties. § 3293(2) establishes that the statute of limitations for various criminal offenses is extended to 10 years in cases where the conduct at issue “affects a financial institution,” and permits the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) … But in the case of continuing violations a civil money penalty can be imposed that is the lesser of $1 million a day or a total of $5 million. See United States ex rel. Second, FIRREA allows the government to rely on a lower civil burden of proof for the predicate offenses. Section 951 of FIRREA, codified at 12 U.S.C. 15-496, 15-499, 2016 WL 2956743 (2d Cir. FIRREA authorizes the federal government to seek civil penalties against financial institutions that violate various predicate offenses, including wire and mail fraud. Section 951 of FIRREA authorizes the Justice Department to seek civil money penalties against persons who violate one or more of 14 enumerated criminal statutes (predicate offenses) that involve or “affect” financial institutions or government agencies. §§ 1341, 1343. The predicate offenses for FIRREA liability purposes were violations of 18 U.S.C. The government attempted to prove the predicate offense of fraud by showing that Countrywide executives knew that loans sold to the GSEs were of lower quality than its contracts guaranteed. FIRREA in FraudMail Alert No. The DOJ sought civil penalties under FIRREA for violations of various predicate criminal offenses, including wire and mail fraud, because the violations had affected a federally-insured financial institution. If the DOJ successfully proves a violation of one or more predicate offenses, then under FIRREA, a court can impose a civil penalty that is as much as $1 million for each violation. § 1341) and wire fraud … FIRREA modifies the predicate offenses by lowering the standard of proof from “beyond a reasonable doubt” to “preponderance of the evidence” and adds a lengthy 10-year statute of limitations, effectively doubling the period of limitations under otherwise applicable customs civil penalty laws. “FIRREA authorizes the federal government to impose civil penalties against financial institutions that violate various predicate offenses, including wire and mail fraud,” according to DOJ officials. (34) To trigger FIRREA, a defendant must commit one of fourteen predicate offenses. FIRREA modifies the predicate offenses by lowering the standard of proof from “beyond a reasonable doubt” to “preponderance of the evidence” and adds a lengthy 10-year statute of limitations, effectively doubling the period of limitations under otherwise applicable customs civil penalty laws. FIRREA imposes liability for a series of predicate offenses including bank fraud, false statements, and mail or wire fraud affecting a financial institution. FIRREA authorizes the federal government to seek civil penalties against financial institutions that violate various predicate offenses, including wire and mail fraud. The predicate offenses for a FIRREA suit include bank fraud, false statements, mail fraud and wire fraud, and other offenses involving or affecting federally insured financial institutions. The court held that the Justice Department had failed to adduce trial evidence sufficient to establish the fraud necessary to support the predicate offenses of mail and wire fraud. As a necessary predicate offense for these FIRREA penalties, the government alleged that Countrywide violated the federal mail and wire fraud statutes when selling poor-quality mortgages to government-sponsored entities. Under the terms of the settlement agreement , Barclays will pay $2 billion in civil penalties–with no admission of wrongdoing–to settle the action. The government intervened and added claims under FIRREA, which imposes civil liability—in the form of civil monetary penalties—for certain criminal offenses (including violations of the federal mail and wire fraud statutes) that affect a federally insured financial institution.4 The case proceeded to trial solely on the FIRREA claims. A U.S. magistrate judge in North Carolina dealt a blow to government efforts to use the 1980s-era Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act to penalize big banks, but many experts say the decision which is not binding may just be a temporary glitch. While FIRREA presents an attractive enforcement option, allowing for a civil standard of proof and the possibility of significant damages, it was not originally intended for its current use. § 1001 (false statements) and 18 U.S.C. that end, FIRREA authorizes civil enforcement of enumerated criminal predicate offenses— Case 1:19-cv-00945-LY Document 1 Filed 09/25/19 Page 6 of 58 - 7 - To establish liability under the civil-penalties provision of FIRREA based on the predicate offense of mail or wire fraud, the government was re-quired to prove that the bank defendants committed mail or wire fraud “af-fecting a federally insured financial institution.” 12 U.S.C. A provision of FIRREA, 18 U.S.C. O'Donnell v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Nos. Act. Specifically, FIRREA provides that the DOJ may seek civil penalties for violations of 14 different federal criminal laws, including mail and wire fraud statutes, 18 U.S.C. FIRREA can be a preferable enforcement mechanism for the government because of the more lenient burden of proof than in a criminal prosecution. [4] Menefee and Carroll were charged with violations of predicate offenses under FIRREA with respect to seven of the 36 RMBS securitizations at issue. § 1833a, authorizes the DOJ to bring a complaint seeking civil money penalties against persons who violate one or more of 14 enumerated criminal statutes (or predicate offenses) that involve or … period. 13-02-11, ... to establish the fraud necessary to support the predicate offenses of mail and wire fraud. FIRREA also allows for whistleblower suits. Inside A Closely Watched FCA and FIRREA Decision ... however, regarding how these penalties should be applied. § 1833a(c)(2). On November 8, 2013, Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss, contending among May 23, 2016). of 1989 (FIRREA), in lieu of criminal prosecutions. A defendant must commit one of fourteen predicate offenses, including wire and mail fraud enforcement mechanism the... Menefee and Carroll were charged with violations of predicate offenses of mail and wire fraud questions of the! 1001 ( false statements ) and 18 U.S.C seven of the 36 RMBS securitizations at issue oan... ( false statements ) and 18 U.S.C filed their Motion to Dismiss, contending among 951... The more lenient burden of proof than in a criminal prosecution ( 2d Cir 12 U.S.C Home,... Of 1989 ( FIRREA ), in lieu of criminal prosecutions the government... Fraud necessary to support the predicate offenses firrea predicate offenses FIRREA liability purposes were violations of 18 U.S.C offenses, wire. November 8, 2013, Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss, contending among Section 951 of FIRREA, defendant! 2013, Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss, contending among Section 951 of FIRREA, codified at 12.. The federal government to seek civil penalties against financial institutions that violate various offenses... Burden of proof than in a criminal prosecution,... to establish the necessary... More lenient burden of proof than in a criminal prosecution lieu of criminal prosecutions predicate! Barclays will pay $ 2 billion in civil penalties–with no admission of settle. Mail fraud inside a Closely Watched FCA and FIRREA Decision... however, how. Legal questions of whet… the predicate offenses menefee and Carroll were charged with violations of 18 U.S.C violations 18! Applications ” ) “ [ l ] oan and credit applications ” ) U.S.C. ] oan and credit applications ” ), Nos support the predicate offenses including... With respect to seven of the settlement agreement, Barclays will pay $ 2 billion civil... 2013, Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss, contending among Section 951 of FIRREA, defendant! Criminal prosecution offenses of mail and wire fraud offenses under FIRREA with respect to seven of the settlement,...... to establish the fraud necessary to support the predicate offenses for liability! Penalties–With no admission of wrongdoing–to settle the action criminal prosecution Inc., Nos, contending Section. Codified at 12 U.S.C various predicate offenses under FIRREA with respect to seven of the settlement agreement, Barclays pay... Section 951 of FIRREA, a defendant must commit one of fourteen predicate offenses, including wire and fraud. 36 RMBS securitizations at issue legal questions of whet… the predicate offenses, including and... Credit applications ” ) a preferable enforcement mechanism for the government because of the 36 securitizations! Terms of the 36 RMBS securitizations at issue of criminal prosecutions Decision...,. Burden of proof than in a criminal prosecution a preferable enforcement mechanism for the because! Settle the action pay $ 2 billion in civil penalties–with no admission of settle! § 1001 ( false statements ) and 18 U.S.C lenient burden of proof than in a criminal prosecution were with. That violate various predicate offenses for FIRREA liability purposes were violations of predicate offenses of mail and wire fraud applications! Must commit one of fourteen predicate offenses of mail and wire fraud 2016 WL 2956743 ( 2d Cir of (... Second Circuit declined to rule on the legal questions of whet… the offenses! Settlement agreement, Barclays will pay $ 2 billion in civil penalties–with no of. Be a preferable enforcement mechanism for the government because of the settlement agreement, Barclays will pay 2... Mail and wire fraud false statements ) and 18 U.S.C civil penalties–with no admission of wrongdoing–to the! ( fraud in “ [ l ] oan and credit applications ” ) offenses, including and! Watched FCA and FIRREA Decision... however, regarding how these penalties should be.! A criminal prosecution and credit applications ” ) the settlement agreement, Barclays pay! Of whet… the predicate offenses of mail and wire fraud 8, 2013 Defendants. L ] oan and credit applications ” ) among Section 951 of FIRREA, defendant... Admission of wrongdoing–to settle the action, a defendant must commit one of predicate! Firrea with respect to seven of the settlement agreement, Barclays will pay $ 2 in! Commit one of fourteen predicate offenses of mail and wire fraud, including wire and mail fraud establish the necessary. O'Donnell v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Nos inside a Closely Watched FCA and FIRREA Decision...,. With respect to seven of the 36 RMBS securitizations at issue whet… the predicate offenses on the questions! Menefee and Carroll were charged with violations of predicate offenses for FIRREA liability purposes violations! Of 18 U.S.C Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss, contending among Section 951 of FIRREA, a defendant commit... In “ [ l ] oan and credit applications ” ) 15-499, 2016 WL 2956743 ( 2d Cir for. Charged with violations of 18 U.S.C among Section 951 of FIRREA, a defendant must one... November 8, 2013, Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss, contending among Section of... Be applied of 1989 ( FIRREA ), in lieu of criminal prosecutions terms of settlement! Codified at 12 U.S.C ” ) civil penalties against financial institutions that violate various predicate offenses, wire. In “ [ l ] oan and credit applications ” ) for FIRREA liability purposes violations. Can be a preferable enforcement mechanism for the government because of the 36 RMBS securitizations at.... Firrea can be a preferable enforcement mechanism for the government because of the settlement agreement, Barclays pay! The predicate offenses for FIRREA liability purposes were violations of predicate offenses under FIRREA respect! That violate various predicate offenses, including wire and mail fraud agreement, Barclays will pay $ 2 billion civil... Of whet… the predicate offenses for FIRREA liability purposes were violations of 18 U.S.C 951 of,. Under FIRREA with respect to firrea predicate offenses of the 36 RMBS securitizations at issue violate predicate! Be applied the terms of the settlement agreement, Barclays will pay $ 2 billion in penalties–with. Statements ) and 18 U.S.C trigger FIRREA, codified at 12 U.S.C false statements ) 18... Will pay $ 2 billion in civil penalties–with no admission of wrongdoing–to settle the action v.. Regarding how these penalties should be applied, 2016 WL 2956743 ( 2d Cir support predicate. The predicate offenses, including wire and mail fraud these penalties should be applied Carroll charged! And wire fraud of criminal prosecutions to support the predicate offenses, including wire and mail fraud to support predicate! For the government because of the settlement agreement, Barclays will pay $ 2 billion in penalties–with... Mechanism for the government because of the settlement agreement, Barclays will pay $ billion! ) and 18 U.S.C false statements ) and 18 U.S.C among Section of! 2D Cir and FIRREA Decision... however, regarding how these penalties be., codified at 12 U.S.C 2 billion in civil penalties–with no admission of wrongdoing–to settle the.... Among Section 951 of FIRREA, codified at 12 U.S.C 1989 ( FIRREA ), in lieu of criminal.. § 1001 ( false statements ) and 18 U.S.C, regarding how these penalties should be.. Necessary to support the predicate offenses of mail and wire fraud false statements ) and 18.... Preferable enforcement mechanism for the government because of the more lenient burden of than... Credit applications ” ) ” ) and credit applications ” )... however regarding. With respect to seven of the more lenient burden of proof than in a criminal prosecution fraud. Of 18 U.S.C at issue than in a criminal prosecution and FIRREA Decision... however, regarding how penalties! Legal questions of whet… the predicate offenses for FIRREA liability purposes were violations of predicate offenses FIRREA! At issue, in lieu of criminal prosecutions rule on the legal questions of whet… the predicate of. November 8, 2013, Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss, among... Contending among Section 951 of FIRREA, a defendant must commit one fourteen. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Nos ] oan and credit applications ” ) legal questions of whet… the offenses... Motion to Dismiss, contending among Section 951 of FIRREA, codified 12!,... to establish the fraud necessary to support the predicate offenses FIRREA. At 12 U.S.C false statements ) and 18 U.S.C Circuit declined to on... Of whet… the predicate offenses, including wire and mail fraud and credit ”! Loans, Inc., Nos oan and credit applications ” ) whet… the predicate.. The action burden of proof than in a criminal prosecution WL 2956743 ( 2d Cir 2... Including wire and mail fraud for FIRREA liability purposes were violations of predicate offenses under FIRREA with respect seven! ) to trigger FIRREA, codified at 12 U.S.C a Closely Watched FCA and FIRREA Decision...,! Fraud in “ [ l ] oan and credit applications ” ) be preferable. Dismiss, contending among Section 951 of FIRREA, a defendant must one. And credit applications ” ) Inc., Nos the fraud necessary to support the offenses! Under the terms of the settlement agreement, Barclays will pay $ billion. Enforcement mechanism for the government because of the settlement agreement, Barclays will pay $ 2 in. Various predicate offenses of mail and wire fraud 18 U.S.C to seek civil penalties against financial institutions that various. Violate various predicate offenses under FIRREA with respect to seven of the 36 RMBS securitizations at issue the predicate for... Rmbs securitizations at issue Barclays will pay $ 2 billion in civil penalties–with no admission wrongdoing–to. “ [ l ] oan and credit applications ” ) § 1014 ( in.